|
A Wyoming trial court granted partial summary judgment to the State, dismissing
plaintiffs’ claim for pre-k funding from the on-going school finance case, Campbell
County Sch. Dist. v. State. Trial is set to begin on October 24, 2005 on
the remedial phase of the case, with plaintiffs alleging that the State has
failed to comply with the Wyoming Supreme Court’s directives in the Campbell
case.
The trial court rested its ruling on a narrow reading of one section of the
education article of the Wyoming Constitution, which requires the legislature "to
make further provision by taxation or otherwise… [to] create and maintain a
thorough and efficient system of public schools [for] all youth… between the
ages of six and twenty-one years." Finding that only the legislature has
the authority to fund an educational program for children under the age of
six, the court failed to consider the broad empowering language of another
section of the education article, which requires the Wyoming legislature to
create public schools "of every needed kind and grade…, and such other
institutions as may be necessary."
In their brief in opposition to summary judgment, plaintiffs presented the
research evidence demonstrating the benefits of high quality preschool for
children and two arguments why the Wyoming Supreme Court rulings in Campbell obligate
the State to fund preschool for all three- and four-year-olds. First, such
programs fit within the Court’s directive in Campbell I that the legislature
design the "best educational system by identifying the proper educational
package each Wyoming student is entitled to have," and then "take
the necessary action to fund that package." Plaintiffs noted that the
State has identified the value of preschool by its own statutes authorizing
school districts to offer pre-k programs; by requiring districts to evaluate
pre-k program effectiveness; and by adopting comprehensive pre-k curriculum
standards. The State recognizes pre-k belongs in the educational package for
all students, yet refuses to fund it.
Second, plaintiffs argued that Cambpell I and Campbell II also
require "ample, appropriate provision for at-risk students" in order
to "level the playing field." Plaintiffs pointed to research showing
that high quality preschool especially benefits economically disadvantaged
preschoolers and other young children at-risk for school failure. Several Wyoming
school districts currently offer pre-k for at-risk students, but without State
aid, can serve only a fraction of the children who need the program.
Laramie County School District No. 1 and the Wyoming Education Association,
who have taken the lead in pursuing the preschool claim in the Campbell case,
plan to appeal the partial summary judgment order at the conclusion of the
trial.
The staff of Starting at 3 helped plaintiffs prepare their brief in opposition
to partial summary judgment. For more information on the preschool claim in
the Campbell case, contact Ellen Boylan, Esq. at (973) 624-1815, ext.
18, or by e-mail, eboylan@edlawcenter.org.
Prepared: September 19, 2005
|