Health IS By Choice

One thing that generations thought was that you get handed with a good or bad health & there was nothing you could do about it. Obviously the parents didn’t know better to educate their children. Fortunately, now we have the necessary knowledge to provide our younger ones with better health in their adulthood.

The major causes of death and disability in the United States are related to diet and lifestyle. This includes high blood pressure, high cholesterol, heart disease, stroke, type II diabetes, obesity, several forms of cancer, osteoporosis, and other chronic diseases. Seven out of ten deaths are directly attributable to lifestyle. Americans lead the world in degenerative diseases. Four out of five persons, age 64 or older, have disabilities or chronic disease. Surely, what we eat today walks and talks tomorrow.

This is even more important to pass onto our children in fact there are numerous studies which report a huge impact if these health lessons are learnt earlier in life.    One of these can be found on the BBC website, which currently is available on the BBC iPlayer accessible by a fast vpn from outside the UK.

Too much fat, too much sugar, salt, and refined foods are specifically linked to six of the ten leading causes of death in the United States and on top of that many suffer from serious conditions like high cholesterol, diabetes, high triglycerides, constipation, which in their turn can cause serious life threatening conditions or diseases. We need not be satisfied to stand by and become one of these statistics. We need not resign ourselves to the fate of “it runs in my family.” We inherit the lifestyle ( diet and habits) of our parents, but we can choose to change.

We will be helping you to reeducate your taste buds, preserve your life, while saving money, shed those excess pounds that refined foods have added, while avoiding starvation diets, help you realize you do need a healthy lifestyle so you can just feel better with renewed energy and clearness of mind. Step by step, one day at a time; a simple plan, to bring you Health in a simple way. You can begin today to take positive steps that can make a difference. After you realize you DO need a healthy lifestyle, I think you will be surprised how easy it is. Remember, health IS by choice…not by chance!

Jenny Collins
Health Blogger and Author of the Best VPN Software

Tags: , ,

A Cell Phone At Age 3?

It is incredible that starting at 3 (and sometimes even earlier!), kids are asking for cell phones these days. Now at the age of three, it is unlikely that they really know what a phone is and how to use it. However, they see their parents using one and see buttons and lights on it which tells them that a cell phone is something exciting.

When a parent starts looking for a cell phone for kids that young, the best bet is to get a dummy phone. One that looks like a real phone, is colorful, and makes noises but doesn’t really work is all you really need to keep a toddler busy. They are just happy feeling that like their parents, they have a phone too.

When you get into the ages of 5 to 9, many parents then want to get their kids a real phone that can be used mainly for safety. Not every parent wants their kids to have a phone at those ages but more and more Moms and Dads like the convenience of being able to call their child at any time. Phones with good parental controls are often desirable for this age group.

For kids who are 10 and older, many are able to convince their parents to get them real cell phones that have a variety of features. For kids this old, it is a never ending battle between them and their parents as to what kind of phone will be allowed. They want phones with everything on them but parents rarely want to spend that much and are still weary of giving their children full access to all the things a smart phone can do.

Tags: ,

Start at 3? We Found A Better Solution

Many experts suggest that a young child’s best place is in the home. The ideal is that a mother should stay at home to look after her children in the early years rather than ship them out to preschool. Of course the problem is and always will be that most families need the mother’s income to help with the bills, so the answer for some will be working but from home.

When my first child was born I was working in an office. The hours were the usual 9 to 5, but I had to travel to work and the journey took two hours each way. Consequently I left before my family woke, and got home after the children went to bed. I was a weekend Dad.

We went through a couple of years when my wife returned to work locally and the children (there were two by then) went to preschool first thing in the morning and she picked them up when she left work. Preschool was expensive and my wife’s income barely covered the cost, and I was still commuting. We had to change our lives, and the answer was for me to work from home. My wife stayed in a paid job as her employment was local, and I stayed at home with the kids trying to earn a living working from home. The first few years were difficult, but my business selling gifts decorated with a family crest eventually grew sufficiently to support our family and my wife and I now work together at home. The children benefited and we are all very close. Preschool starting at 3? It may be the answer for some but we found a better one.

Wine and Kids

I’m a member of a wine of the month club.  My wife and I love the wines and we love being able to talk about them with friends, family and the other club members,

When our son was born we had a few people ask us if we planned to continue drinking wine with a baby in the house.  We had never given it any thought…what are we teaching him?  Is there a safe way to store wine?

Overall we came to the conclusion that being upfront and honest with our son about drinking and what happens if you abuse alcohol was better than acting like it didn’t exist.  Rightly or wrongly, that’s our plan!

Introduction

Early childhood research plays a critical part in the effort to ascertain the legal right to preschool. Scientific studies demonstrate that such programs offer children with skills important to school success, and may help close the particular achievement gap among low-income children and their much more affluent peers. Findings on the benefits of preschool have proved pivotal in a growing variety of court cases as well as other advocacy efforts.

This kind of evidence, for example, persuaded New Jersey’s Supreme Court to order funding with regard to preschool in its 25 lowest-income school districts, as a means of lifting students’ vocabulary and cognitive skills in those districts, so the children will be better prepared for school. In Massachusetts, a trial court judge mentioned similar evidence within recommending state financing for preschool, along with research showing benefits to the larger community, including lower rates associated with crime and a lot more educated, productive workforce. A growing body regarding literature also demonstrates many middle class youngsters can benefit from high quality preschool. This evidence is especially useful to policy-makers and promoters working to create universal access to preschool and support for other publicly funded early on education programs.

Key Legal Cases

New Jersey’s Abbott v. Burke case and Massachusetts’ Hancock sixth is v. Driscoll trial court selection show how key early childhood research can be in successful a favorable court lording it over. Both lawsuits questioned the states’ school finance systems, charging their state failed to provide high-poverty school districts with the resources necessary for students to obtain a constitutionally adequate public schooling – one that would aid prepare students for his or her roles as citizens and competitors in the global workforce. Hence, the children in those districts, who have the maximum educational needs due to their low socioeconomic status, tend to be disadvantaged when compared with their own peers in more affluent districts.

In both cases, the actual courts adopted the states’ established curriculum requirements as the guideline for an adequate education. The courts then accepted scientific studies as evidence that preschool could serve as a remedy, helping deprived children to arrive in kindergarten with the same skills as their more advantaged friends from other districts, therefore ready to master the actual curriculum standards as well as attain a constitutionally adequate education.

In Nj-new jersey, the Supreme Court discovered the evidence so powerful that it mandated “well-planned, large quality” preschool for every 3- and also 4-year-old living in the 30 lowest-income districts, now called the Abbott districts. New Jersey hence became the first state to establish a constitutional duty on the part of the state to provide preschool education. In Massachusetts, in the spring associated with 2004, the test court judge inside the Driscoll case similarly recommended preschool as a remedy for students from low-income zones. That state’s Substantial Judicial Court is expected to reply to the trial courtroom judge’s recommendation by the winter season of 2005.

In the Abbott and Driscoll, the idol judges found the testimony of Dr. Dorrie Barnett, director of the Nationwide Institute for Earlier Education Research (NIEER) from Rutgers University to be specifically persuasive. As a top educational economist, Barnett detailed the ways that preschool might help children from low income families together with language, cognitive, sociable and even emotional expertise so that they start university on par with their more affluent peers. The courts adopted Doctor. Barnett’s testimony on the great things about high quality preschool for disadvantaged children, citing the potential for such plans to improve children’s school readiness, socialization expertise and school overall performance, as well as the potential for such programs to reduce the need for remedial programs or special education regarding disadvantaged children.

Legal court in Massachusetts also cited Dr. Barnett’s account on the long-term benefits, such as increased high school graduating rates and university attendance, better work and reduced crime among children which graduate from good preschool programs. Of equal importance, the courts also adopted Medical professional. Barnett’s testimony that toddler education programs has to be high quality if they are to be effective. Research-based standards for high quality, because found by the courts in both cases, include college-educated instructors certified in early training, small classes, and standards for understanding and teaching.

Help For State Endeavours

Governors, state lawmakers, business leaders and grassroots activists wanting to expand and enhance public preschool initiatives also find the technological evidence extremely helpful. Philadelphia Governor Rendell’s stalwart insistence that his state fund a new preschool initiative as part of his 2004-05 price range, for example, cited “[o]ver Thirty years of research confirm[ing] the advantages of quality early education and care.Inch

Similarly, Illinois Governor George Ryan’s 2002 Executive Order 1 called for universal access to high quality preschool programs because “scientific studies provide strong proof that quality earlier education plays a vital role in the healthful development of children.Inch California lawmakers used the specific finding that “[e]arly years as a child education programs for youngsters of low-income families have been shown increase high school college rates and university entry rates, to cut back the need for special schooling and grade degree retention, and to decrease high school dropout rates” when they launched a state-funded preschool program for at-risk children.

In the same way, the Arkansas legislature cited research on college achievement when creating its state preschool system: “[l]ow-income children who get high-quality early care and also education score considerably higher on checks of reading as well as math from their main years through midsection adolescence.” Such scientific evidence also helped convince Florida voters to amend their particular constitution in Two thousand and two to require that express to provide a preschool training to all its four-year-olds. The newest mandate requires a good “early childhood development as well as education program that shall be voluntary, good quality, free, and delivered according to professionally accepted standards.”

Economic Benefits for Modern society

The scientific evidence also shows that top quality preschool provides a high return to society. Together with graduates of preschool more highly knowledgeable, communities spend less cash on remedial services, special education and legal justice. This research is particularly useful in the intention and public plan arenas, where community officials are concerned regarding long-term costs and advantages.

The trial determine in the Driscoll case mentioned some of these long-range benefits in her report. In its Abbott Sixth is v ruling, the New Hat Supreme Court also acknowledged preschool funding as a possible “investment” rather than an expense, based on studies that show exactly how preschool boosts pupil achievement, saving the state the costs of helpful and special training programs.

National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER)