|
Overview
North Carolina's More at Four program is a state-funded, community-based voluntary pre-kindergarten initiative designed to prepare at-risk four-year-olds for success in school. Programs are operated in almost all counties in the state by schools, child care centers, and Head Start agencies that can meet quality standards. North Carolina also funds Smart Start, a separate public-private initiative that supports comprehensive early childhood services for children from birth to kindergarten in all of the state's counties. Smart
Start funding may be used for many purposes,
including the support of pre-kindergarten
programs. Most of the rules governing the More at Four program are in administrative guidelines, which do not have the force and effect of statute or regulation.
The More at Four program has
grown rapidly over the last few years
due, in part, to pressure arising from
decisions in the school funding case, Hoke County v. State, directing
the state to address the needs of students at risk for school failure. According
to the National Institute for Early Education
Research (NIEER), the pre-k program served approximately 12% of all
four-year-olds, or 15,227 children, in 2005-2006, made possible through
a funding increase of $16.5 million. The state’s new Education Lottery
was expected to generate $425 million a year beginning in 2006, with a substantial
portion of net revenues earmarked for prekindergarten programs for at-risk four-year-olds.
For FY 2007, $84.6 million from the lottery fund was appropriated for the
prekindergarten program. The appropriation was increased to $140.6 million
for FY 2008 to help expand More at Four access to an additional 10,000 children.
State Policy
North Carolina law recognizes that
the economic future and well being
of the state depend upon providing
access to high-quality
early childhood education and development
services to all children who
could benefit from it. The state's
preschool guidelines recognize that
success in kindergarten depends upon
preparation in five
major domains. Also, the new
Education Lottery addresses
the need for high quality prekindergarten
programs for at-risk four-year-olds
in order to help those four-year-olds
be prepared to succeed
in school.
Eligibility Criteria
More at Four is
provided to four-year olds deemed at-risk of
academic failure. Priority is given
to children who have not previously
participated in an early care and
education program and who are eligible
to enter kindergarten the following
school year. Starting
in 2004-05, at least 80% of participants
must come from families at or below
75% of the North Carolina State
median income. Beginning in 2007, children
of active duty members of the armed
forces were made eligible for the
program, as well as children with
a parent injured or killed while
serving in the military.
Program Length/Duration
More at Four preschool is provided at no cost for 6 to 6 ½ hours per day for a ten month school year. Extended or wrap-around services may be offered after the regular More at Four school day at a cost to parents.
Funding
More at Four has
been funded out
of general appropriations through the
Department of Health and Human Services
budget. In August 2005, legislation was
enacted creating the North
Carolina Education Lottery. Fifty
percent of the net revenue from the
lottery will be used “to support
reduction of class size in early grades
to class size allotments not exceeding
1:18 … and to support
academic prekindergarten programs for
at-risk four-year-olds …” The
legislature estimated that the lottery
would generate $425 million for education
purposes beginning in the 2006-2007 fiscal
year.
A local
match is currently required for
the More at Four program, but
the amount is not specified in the
law
or
guidance
documents. Fees may
not be assessed to More at Four families
for services during the regular school
day, but may
be charged for wrap-around services and
transportation. Fees may be charged for
meals for children who are not eligible
for free or reduced price lunch.
Quality Standards
In a national survey
of quality standards, the National
Institute for Early Education Research
(NIERR) gave North Carolina's preschool
program a rating of 10 out of 10 on its
checklist of quality benchmarks, making
North Carolina one of only two states
with a perfect score. Programs must have a maximum class
size of 18 children with a staff-child
ratio of 1:9. Teachers must
hold a bachelor's degree with a specialized
birth-to-kindergarten certification;
assistant teachers must be CDA-credentialed. There
is an emphasis on family
involvement.
North Carolina
requires that all More at Four classrooms
select and implement a research-based
curriculum that has appropriate academic
emphasis and research that shows it
helps prepare students for success
in school. Six
curricula have
been recommended to date. In 2005,
the state adopted comprehensive early
learning standards that are
applicable to the More at Four program.
North Carolina also
meets NIEER’s benchmark for monitoring through
required site visits.
Delivery of Preschool Services
The More at Four program builds on existing service delivery systems and requires shared responsibility in
the community for providing pre-kindergarten services to at-risk children. Programs may be provided by local school boards or private childcare providers that can meet the quality standards. Private
child care centers and Head Start agencies must have a four or five-star
license - the top quality
ratings under the state's child care licensing system - or have a three-star
license and be working towards four stars. The state strongly recommends
that public school prekindergarten programs comply with 4 or 5 star licensure
requirements.
The More at Four program is under
the oversight of the Office of
School Readiness in the Department
of Public Instruction, which coordinates
the efforts of different state
programs
serving
preschoolers, including More at
Four, Title I, Even Start, and Exceptional
Children programs.
Requirements for Student Assessment and Program Evaluation
The More at Four program must include ongoing
assessment of the children, a quality-control
system, and a system of accountability. The
Department of Health and Human Services and the
Department of Public Instruction are required
to report on several aspects of the program,
including the number of children, expected expenditures,
cost per child, location of program sites, and
expansion plans. The More at Four local
contract administrator is required to monitor
participating preschool programs for programmatic
and fiscal compliance. Additionally, the More
at Four state office is authorized to evaluate
programs using the ECERS rating scale, a standardized
measure of early childhood classroom structure
and process, and to use the information to assist
with program improvements.
Education Clause in State Constitution
The North Carolina state constitution provides that "[t]he people have a right to the privilege of education, and it is the duty of the State to guard and maintain that right." The General Assembly is responsible for providing "a general and uniform system of free public schools . . . wherein equal opportunities shall be provided for all students." The General Assembly may assign the responsibility for financial support of public schools to local government, as appropriate.
Summary of Case Law on School Finance System
North Carolina recognizes that
equal access to a sound basic education
is a fundamental
right guaranteed by the state constitution.
Although state courts have denied
equal protection challenges to North Carolina's
school funding scheme, holding that the constitution
does not require equal funding in all school
districts, they have also invalidated the
school finance system under the education
clause on the ground that the system failed
to provide adequate resources and services
to at-risk children.
In Leandro v. State, the Supreme
Court of North Carolina defined a "sound
basic education" as one that provides
sufficient reading, writing, and arithmetic
skills to enable students to function in
society; sufficient knowledge of history
and politics to enable students to make
informed choices; and sufficient academic
or vocational skills to enable students
to engage in post-secondary or vocational
training and to compete with others for
gainful employment. On remand from
the Supreme Court, the trial court in Hoke
County v. State found that
North Carolina had met the Leandro standard
with respect to curriculum standards, teacher
certification, and accountability standards,
but not with respect to adequate resources
and services for at-risk children. In
July 2004, the Supreme Court affirmed the
trial court's finding that the state had
failed to provide at-risk students with
an opportunity to obtain a sound basic
education. Furthermore, the Supreme Court
held the state was required to assess its
education-related allocations to the county's
schools and correct the deficiencies preventing
the county from offering its at-risk students
the opportunity to obtain a Leandro-conforming
education.
Summary of Case Law on Preschool On remand from the Supreme Court's decision
in Leandro v. State, the trial court
in Hoke
County v. State raised on its
own motion the issue of the right of at-risk
children to preschool education. The
court held that the state constitutional
right to a sound basic education recognized
in Leandro is not dependent upon age,
but rather on the needs of the particular
child. The court further found that
the state was thereby required to provide
a pre-kindergarten program for those children
at-risk of not entering kindergarten ready
to learn. In July 2004, the Supreme
Court affirmed the trial court's finding
that the state had violated the constitutional
rights of at-risk four-year olds. However,
it reversed the trial court's order requiring
the state to fund a preschool
program. The court refused to impose a specific remedy at this stage of
the school finance case, instead deferring to the expertise of the legislative
and executive branches to design an appropriate remedy for at-risk preschoolers.
N.C. Const. art. I, § 15
The people have a right to the privilege of education, and it is the duty of the State to guard and maintain that right.
N.C. Const. art. IX, § 2
1. General and uniform system: term. The General Assembly shall provide by taxation and otherwise for a general and uniform system of free public schools, which shall be maintained at least nine months in every year, and wherein equal opportunities shall be provided for all students.
2. Local responsibility. The General Assembly may assign to units of local government such responsibility for the financial support of the free public schools as it may deem appropriate. The governing boards of units of local government with financial responsibility for public education may use local revenues to add to or supplement any public school or post-secondary school program.
N.C. Const. art. IX, § 3
The General Assembly shall provide that every child of appropriate age and of sufficient mental and physical ability shall attend the public schools, unless educated by other means.
N.C. Const. art. IX, § 5
The State Board of Education shall supervise
and administer the free public school system and the educational funds
provided for its support, except the funds mentioned
in Section 7 of this Article, and shall make
all needed rules and regulations in relation
thereto, subject to laws enacted by the General
Assembly.
Is
Education a Fundamental Right under the State
Constitution?
Britt v. North Carolina State Board of Education, 86 N.C. App. 282, 289, 357 S.E.2d 432, 436 (N.C. App.), rev. denied 320 N.C. 790, 361 S.E.2d 71 (1987)
"The fundamental right that is guaranteed by our Constitution . . . is to equal access to our public schools -- that is, every child has a fundamental right to receive an education in our public schools. Furthermore, the State is given responsibility for overseeing the public schools of this State in order to ensure that every student in the State receives the education to which he or she is entitled."
Leandro v. State, 346 N.C. 336, 488 S.E.2d 249 (1997)
Every child is guaranteed "an opportunity to
receive a sound basic education." Leandro,
346 N.C. at 354, 488 S.E.2d at 259. If
the state denies children a sound basic education, "a
denial of a fundamental right will have been
established," requiring the state to show that
its actions are "necessary to promote a compelling
governmental interest." Id. at 357,
488 S.E.2d at 261.
School
Finance Cases in Favor of Plaintiffs:
Hoke County Board of Education v. State, No. 95CVS1158, 2000 WL 1639686 (N.C. Super. Oct. 12, 2000)
In Leandro v. State, 346 N.C. 336, 488
S.E.2d 249 (1997), discussed below, the Supreme
Court of North Carolina remanded back to the
lower court for
trial plaintiffs' claim that the state's education funding system did not
provide a sound basic education. The remand proceeding is known as Hoke
County Board of Education v. State or Leandro II.
On remand, the Superior Court
of North Carolina examined the state's education system in light
of the Leandro mandate that every child
be provided with an equal opportunity to receive
a sound basic education. The Court found,
among other things, that: (1) the state's
curriculum guidelines exceeded the Leandro standards
for a constitutionally adequate education, provided
proper implementation; (2) the state's standards
for teacher certification were valid and constitutionally
sufficient to ensure qualified teaching; (3)
the schools' accountability program was
appropriate for measuring and improving the academic
performance
of public school children; and (4) the state's
tests were probative evidence of whether students
were receiving the opportunity to obtain a sound
basic education. Hoke, 2000 WL 1639686
at *91. (unpublished opinion) With respect
to at-risk children, however, the Court found
that those not presently
in quality
pre-kindergarten were being denied their fundamental
right to receive a sound basic education and
ordered the state to expand pre-kindergarten
education
for at-risk children. Id. at *113. In
two subsequent decisions, the Court again found
that the state had failed to provide sufficient
resources to ensure a sound basic education to
at-risk children. See Hoke County Bd.
of Educ. v. State, 95 CVS 1158, Orders of
March 2001 and April 2002.
Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 599 S.E.2d 365 (2004) (Leandro II)
The North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the
trial court's finding that the State has violated
the rights of at-risk children by failing to
provide the resources to enable them to receive
a sound basic education, as guaranteed under
the North Carolina Constitution. The Supreme
Court affirmed the lower court's remedial order
requiring the State to reassess school funding
allocations and correct all deficiencies that
prevent schools from delivering the constitutionally
required education. In particular, the
Court affirmed the trial court's order requiring
the State to "structure its proposed solutions
to ensure there are competent teachers in classrooms,
competent principals in schoolhouses, and adequate
resources to sustain instruction and support
programs that will aid the ... school children
to gain their opportunity to obtain a [constitutionally
adequate] education." The North Carolina
Supreme Court reversed the trial court's order
requiring the State to provide pre-kindergarten
education to at-risk children. Instead, the Court
deferred to the expertise of the legislative
and executive branches, leaving it to them to
design appropriate corrective action to meet
the needs of at-risk preschool children.
Standard
for a Constitutionally Adequate Education:
Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners of Granville County, 174 N.C. 469, 472, 93 S.E. 1001, 1002 (1917)
"[I]t is manifest that these constitutional provisions were intended to establish a system of public education adequate to the needs of a great and progressive people, affording school facilities of recognized and ever-increasing merit to all the children of the state and to the full extent that our means could afford and intelligent direction accomplish."
Leandro v. State, 346 N.C. 336, 488 S.E.2d 249 (1997)
"Article I, Section 15 and Article IX, Section 2 of the North Carolina Constitution combine to guarantee every child of this state an opportunity to receive a sound basic education in our public schools. For purposes of our Constitution, a 'sound basic education' is one that will provide the student with at least: (1) sufficient ability to read, write, and speak the English language and a sufficient knowledge of fundamental mathematics and physical science to enable the student to function in a complex and rapidly changing society; (2) sufficient fundamental knowledge of geography, history, and basic economic and political systems to enable the student to make informed choices with regard to issues that affect the student personally or affect the student's community, state, and nation; (3) sufficient academic and vocational skills to enable the
student to successfully engage in post-secondary education or vocational training; and (4) sufficient academic and vocational skills to enable the student to compete on an equal basis with others in further formal education or gainful employment in contemporary society." Leandro, 346 N.C. at 347, 488 S.E.2d at 255 (citing Rose v. Council for Better Educ., Inc., 790 S.W.2d 186, 212 (Ky. 1989) and Pauley v. Kelley, 162 W.Va. 672, 705-06, 255 S.E.2d 859, 877 (1979)).
School
Finance Cases against Plaintiffs:
Britt v. North Carolina State Board of Education, 86 N.C. App. 282, 289, 357 S.E.2d 432, 436 (N.C. App.), rev. denied 320 N.C. 790, 361 S.E.2d 71 (1987)
The North Carolina Court of Appeals found in this case that the method of financing the state public schools was constitutional, "since plaintiffs have not alleged that they are being denied an education, but only that they are not receiving the same educational opportunities as students in some other places in the State." The Court noted that "the State is required to provide a general and uniform education for the students in its charge," but ruled that "there is no requirement that it provide identical opportunities to each and every student."
Leandro v. State, 346 N.C. 336, 349, 488 S.E.2d 249, 256 (1997)
In this action alleging violations of the state
constitutional right to equal educational opportunity
resulting from disparities in wealth among school
districts, the North Carolina Supreme Court found
that "the equal opportunities clause of Article
IX, Section 2(1) does not require substantially
equal funding or educational advantages in all
school districts . . . [T]he provisions of the
current state system for funding schools which
require or allow counties to help finance their
school systems and result in unequal funding
among the school districts of the state do not
violate constitutional principles." At the same time, the Court found that
the state was responsible for providing adequate funding and services to
ensure that all students receive a sound basic education.
Banks v. County of Buncombe, 128 N.C. App. 214, 222-23, 494 S.E.2d 791, 796-97 (N.C. App. 1998)
In a challenge to Buncombe County's method of distributing school funds, which resulted in superior resources for some districts at the expense of others, the Court of Appeals of North Carolina held that the county's distribution method did not implicate equal protection because the state constitution does not require substantially equal funding or educational advantages in all districts and that access to educational opportunities, unlike equal access to education, is not a fundamental right.
Hoke County Board of Education v. State, No. 95CVS1158, 2000 WL 1639686 (N.C. Super. Oct. 12, 2000)
Plaintiffs complained that the Hoke County school
system lacked the resources to provide its students
the opportunity for a sound basic education and
that the present system of funding was unconstitutional
because it did not take the varying educational
needs of children into account. The Superior
Court of Wake County held that the state's education
funding system was sound and flexible enough
to provide adequate funding to all school districts.
However, see the discussion of Hoke above,
regarding the court’s finding regarding
at-risk students.
Decisions
Ruling School Finance Issues Were Non-Justiciable:
None. But see Leandro v. State,
346 N.C. 336, 488 S.E.2d 249 (1997).
In Leandro, the North Carolina Supreme
Court rejected the "nonjusticiable political
question" defense raised by the state. "It
has long been understood that it is the duty
of the courts to determine the meaning of the
requirements of our Constitution. When a government
action is challenged as unconstitutional, the
courts have a duty to determine whether that
action exceeds constitutional limits. Therefore,
it is the duty of this Court to address plaintiff-parties'
constitutional challenge to the state's public
education system." Leandro, 346 N.C. at
344, 488 S.E.2d at 253. However, "the courts
of the state must grant every reasonable deference
to the legislative and executive branches when
considering whether they have established and
are administering a system that provides the
children of the various school districts of the
state a
sound basic education. Only . . . a clear showing will justify a
judicial intrusion into an area so clearly the province, initially at least,
of the legislative and executive branches as the determination of what course
of action will lead to a sound basic education." Id. at 357, 488
S.E.2d at 261.
Cases
Related to State-Funded Preschool:
Hoke County Board of Education v. State, No. 95CVS1158, 2000 WL 1639686 (N.C. Super. Oct. 12, 2000)
In this case alleging denial of adequate educational opportunity to children in poor districts as a result of the state's school funding system, the Superior Court raised on its own motion the issue of the rights of pre-kindergarten age children - specifically, whether the constitutional rights enumerated in Leandro extended to certain "at risk" children before they reach the age of five. The
plaintiffs then filed amended complaints alleging
the need for pre-kindergarten programs in order
to prepare "at-risk" children to be able to
take advantage of the opportunity for a sound
basic education.
The Court held, "Under the North
Carolina Constitution as interpreted by Leandro, the right of
each child to an equal opportunity to receive
a sound basic education in the public schools
is not to be conditioned upon age, but rather
upon the need of the particular child, including,
if necessary, the equal opportunity of an at-risk
child to receive early childhood pre-kindergarten
education prior to reaching the age of five and
prior to entering five-year old kindergarten
. . . The Court's decision does not require the
State of North Carolina to provide every four
(4) year old child with a pre-kindergarten program
at state expense. A universal four year old pre-kindergarten
program is not required to meet the sound basic
education standard of Leandro because,
fortunately, the majority of four year olds are
not at-risk and are able to enter ... kindergarten
at age five ready to learn." Hoke,
2000 WL 1639686 at *113
Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 599 S.E.2d 365 (2004) (Leandro II)
In a July 2004 decision, the North Carolina
Supreme Court reversed a 2000 trial court decision
directing the State to fund preschool education
for all low-income students at risk for school
failure. The Court agreed with the trial court's
finding that the State's efforts towards providing
assistance to disadvantaged pre-kindergarten
children were constitutionally inadequate. However,
the Court refused to order preschool education
as a remedy for two reasons: (1) the separation
of powers doctrine required that the Court defer
to the legislature to devise a remedy for preschool
children, at least at this point in the litigation;
and (2) there was insufficient evidence in the
record that preschool would ameliorate the learning
disadvantageous of low-income children.
Pending
School Finance Cases:
Hoke County v. State of North Carolina, Superior Court, Wake County
Following the North Carolina Supreme Court's 2004 decision in Hoke
County (Leandro
II), the Leandro case is proceeding on remand on the factual allegations regarding the inadequacy of public education in the state's low-wealth, urban school districts. The remand trial is proceeding before Judge Howard Manning, Jr., who presided over the Hoke
County trial.
North Carolina General Statutes (N.C.
Gen. Stat.) §143B-168.10 et seq., Early Childhood Initiatives - Smart Start
North Carolina General Statutes (N.C. Gen.
Stat.) § 18C-160 et seq., North
Carolina State Lottery Fund
(The More at Four program is not codified
in the General Statutes, but is enacted each
year by the General Assembly in the Session
Laws as part of the annual Current Appropriations
and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act.)
North Carolina Session Laws 2006-66, § 10.67,
More at Four Program
North Carolina Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24,
More at Four Program
Non-regulatory guidance provided in More
at Four Pre-Kindergarten Program: Program
Guidelines and Requirements,
referred to as Guidelines below.
Provisions
Expressing State Policy on Preschool:
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143B-168.10: The General Assembly finds, upon consultation with the Governor, that every child can benefit from, and should have access to, high-quality early childhood education and development services. The economic future and well-being of the State depend upon it. To ensure that all children have access to high-quality early childhood education and development services, the General Assembly further finds that:
(1) Parents have the primary duty to raise, educate, and transmit values to young preschool children;
(2) The State can assist parents in their role as the primary caregivers and educators of young preschool children; and
(3) There is a need to explore innovative approaches and strategies for aiding parents and families in the education and development of young preschool children.
Guidelines
at 1-1: The mission of the More at
Four Pre-kindergarten
Program is to deliver high-quality prekindergarten
services to prepare at-risk children in North
Carolina for school success.
Programs participating in the More at
Four Pre-Kindergarten
Program are required to meet high-quality
standards. The More
at Four Pre-Kindergarten Program standards
are built on the premise that in order to
be successful academically in school, children
need to be prepared in all five of the major
domains of development outlined by the National
Education Goals Panel. Each of these
domains is critical to children's well being,
in particular for their success in reading
and math as they come to school. The
five domains, as reflected in Foundations:
Early Learning Standards for North Carolina
Preschoolers and Strategies for Guiding Their
Success, are:
- Approaches to learning
- Emotional and social development
- Health and physical development
- Language development and communication
- Cognition development
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 18C-164(c):
The Commission shall distribute the remaining
net revenue of the Education Lottery Fund,
as follows, in the following manner:
(1) A sum equal to fifty percent (50%)
to support reduction of class size in
early grades to
class size allotments not exceeding 1:18
in order to eliminate achievement gaps
and to
support academic prekindergarten programs
for at-risk four-year-olds who would
otherwise not be served in a high-quality
education
program
in order to help those four-year-olds be
prepared developmentally to succeed in
school.
…
Eligibility
Criteria for State Preschool Program:
N.C. Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24(a):
. . . for at-risk four-year-olds who are at
risk of failure in kindergarten . . . . The
program shall include:
(1) A process and system for identifying children at risk of academic failure.
(2) A process and system for identifying
children who are not being served
in formal early education programs, such as
child care, public or private preschools, Head
Start, Early Head Start, early intervention
programs, or other such programs, who demonstrate
educational needs, and who are eligible to
enter kindergarten the next school year, as
well as children who are underserved. ...
N.C. Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24(d):
For the 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 fiscal years,
the "More
At Four" program shall establish income
eligibility requirements for the program not
to exceed seventy-five percent (75%) of the
State median income. Up
to twenty percent (20%) of children enrolled
may have family incomes in excess of seventy-five
percent (75%) of median income if they have
other designated risk factors. Furthermore,
any age-eligible child of (i) an active duty
member of the armed forces of the United States,
including the North Carolina National Guard,
State military forces, or a reserve component
of the armed forces, who is ordered to active
duty by the proper authority within the last
18 months or expected to be ordered within
the next 18 months, or (ii) a member of the
armed forces of the United States, including
the North Carolina National Guard, State military
forces, or a reserve component of the armed
forces, who was injured or killed while serving
on active duty, shall be eligible for the program.
Guidelines § 3.A. More at Four Child
Enrollment Eligibility and Service Priority
Children served in a More at Four slot
must meet age requirements, income eligibility,
or eligibility for children in military families,
and service priority criteria as defined in
this section.
Age Requirements.
1. Children to be enrolled must be four
years of age on or before October 16th in
the year served.
2. Children
age eligible for kindergarten cannot be
served with More at Four funds.
. . .
Eligibility by Income
Eligibility for More
at Four is determined by
family size and gross income. Children in
families with annual incomes at or below 75%
of the
State Median Income (SMI) level are eligible
for More at Four services (See Table
1 [omitted]).
…
Eligibility for Families above 75% of the State
Median Income (SMI) Level
When a family’s
gross income exceeds 75% of the State Median
Income (SMI), a child may
be deemed eligible if the following conditions
are met. Their gross income is below 300%
of
poverty* (See Table 2 [omitted]), and they
meet one of the criteria listed below:
- Limited English
Proficiency (LEP) as indicated by the family
and/or child speaking limited or
no English in the home;
- Identified
Disability as indicated by the child having
a current Individualized Education Program
(IEP);
- Chronic Heath
Condition as indicated by a health care provider
diagnosis, e.g., asthma, childhood obesity,
sickle cell anemia, cancer, HIV;
- Developmental/Educational
Need as indicated by the child performance
results on a developmental
screen.
Up to 20% of
a county's/region’s More
at Four slots may be filled by children above
the 75% of the State Median Income level. Children
meeting military eligibility are excluded from
this percentage.
* A request for an exception to the 300% poverty
cap may be made if compelling evidence exists
that the child in question would best be served
in the More at Four Program.
Temporary Assistance to Needy Families Maintenance
of Effort (TANF MOE)
When a child is determined eligible for services,
a % of poverty category must be determined
(See Table 2 [omitted]), entered on the Eligibility/Enrollment
Scorecard sheet and in MAFKids. This information
will be used to determine TANF MOE.
Eligibility for Children in Military Families
A child is eligible for More at Four if at least
one parent or legal guardian of this child
is an active duty member of the armed forces
of the United States (Army, Navy, Marine Corps,
Air Force and Coast Guard) or the North Carolina
National Guard or other state military force,
or a Reserve Unit of the armed forces who is
ordered to active duty by the proper authority
within the last 18 months or expected to be
ordered within the next 18 months. A child
whose parent or legal guardian has been seriously
injured or killed while on active duty is also
eligible.
…
Guidelines § 3.B.
Service Priority Status
After a pool of eligible children is determined,
service priority status (served vs. unserved)
should be used to prioritize those children
for More at Four services.
1. Unserved Children
a. Children
who have never been served in any preschool
or child care setting.
b. Children
who are currently
unserved (previously in preschool or
child care setting).
c. Children
served for 5 months
or less
in the year prior to service in the More
at Four program in any preschool or child
care setting..
2. Underserved Children
a. Children who are in unregulated child care
that does not meet the More at Four Pre-K standards.
b. Children who are not receiving subsidy,
but are in some kind of regulated preschool
or child care setting,
c. Other
children, including
those in pre-kindergartens or child care that
do not meet More
at Four program standards. This is the last
resort and documentation that children who fit
the unserved
category were diligently recruited should be
available.
Exception
Fifty percent
(50%) of the More at Four Pre-K slots designated
to a site can be used to serve
that site’s three-year-old children when
they become age eligible for More at Four and
meet More at Four eligibility requirements.
Program
Length/Duration:
Guidelines § 4.B. Service
Delivery
Official More at Four Day and Year
1. More at Four Pre-Kindergarten sites
must provide a pre-kindergarten program for
a regular school day (e.g., 6 or 6 ½ hours)
for a 10-month (180 instructional days a
year) school calendar year. If a More
at Four site is not located in the public
schools, the hours of operation should be
consistent with the school system in the
geographic area
where the site is located. Additionally,
the site's 180 day schedule should generally
track the local public school calendar. If
there is a need to deviate, the More at
Four provider must submit a specific
180 day calendar to the local More at
Four contractor.
2. Days set aside for home visits and staggered
entry at the beginning of the school year may
be included as part of the 180-day school calendar
year.
Guidelines § 4.C. Program Fees– Wraparound
Services and Fees
More at Four dollars may not be used to pay
for wraparound services (time periods before
or after the regular school day). When wraparound
services are provided before and/or after the
regular school day, during holidays, or summer
months, the provider may charge a fee for that
service or accept a subsidy voucher from a
participating family.
Scope
of State’s Responsibility to Provide
Preschool:
N.C. Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24(a): The
Department of Public Instruction shall continue
the implementation of the "More
At Four" pre-kindergarten program for
at-risk four-year-olds who are at risk of failure
in kindergarten. The program is available statewide
to all counties that choose to participate, including
underserved areas. The goal of the program is
to provide quality pre-kindergarten services
to a greater number of at-risk children in order
to enhance kindergarten readiness for these children.
. . .
N.C. Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24(b): The Department of Public Instruction
shall implement a plan to expand "More
At Four" program standards within
existing resources to include four- and five-star-rated
centers and schools serving four-year-olds
and develop
guidelines
for these programs . . . . The “NC Prekindergarten
Program Standards Initiative” shall recognize four-
and five-star-rated centers that choose to
apply and meet equivalent "More at Four" program
standards as high quality pre-k classrooms.
Classrooms meeting these standards shall have access
to training and workshops
for "More at Four" programs.
Whenever expansion slots are available, these
classrooms shall have first priority to receive
them.
Scope of State's
Responsibility to Fund Preschool:
N.C. Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24(a): The
["More
at Four"] program shall include:
. . . (6) Guidelines for a system to reimburse local school boards and systems, private child care providers, and other entities willing to establish and provide pre-kindergarten programs to serve at-risk children.
. . . (10) A local contribution. Programs
must demonstrate that they are accessing resources
other than "More
at Four".
. . . (12) Consideration of the reallocation
of existing funds. In order to maximize current
funding and resources, the Department of
Health and Human Services and the Department
of Public
Instruction shall consider
the reallocation of existing funds from State
and local programs that provide pre-kindergarten
related care and services.
N.C. Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24(b): .
. . The “NC Prekindergarten Program
Standards Initiative” shall recognize four-
and five-star-rated centers that choose to
apply and meet equivalent "More at Four" program
standards as high quality pre-k classrooms.
Classrooms meeting these standards shall have access
to training and workshops for "More
at Four" programs.
Whenever expansion slots are available, these
classrooms shall have first priority to receive
them.
The "More At Four" program shall
review the number of slots filled by counties
on a monthly
basis and shift the unfilled slots to counties
with waiting lists. The shifting of slots shall
occur through January 31 of each year, at which
time any remaining funds for slots unfilled shall
be used
to meet the needs of the waiting list for subsidized
child care.
N.C. Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24(c): The
Department of Public Instruction shall submit
a
report by February 1, 2008,
to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental
Operations, the Joint Legislative Education
Oversight Committee, the Senate Appropriations
Committee on Education, the
House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee
on Education, and the Fiscal
Research Division. This final report shall
include the following:
. . . (3) The expected expenditures for the programs and the source of the local match for each grantee.
. . . (5) A comprehensive cost analysis
of the program, including the cost per child
served by the program.
N.C. Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24(e): The "More
At Four" program funding
shall not supplant any funding for classrooms
serving four-year-olds as of the 2005-2006
fiscal year. Support of existing four-year-old
classrooms with "More at Four" program
funding shall be permitted when current funding
is eliminated, reduced or redirected as required
to meet other specified federal or State
educational mandates.
Guidelines § 4.C.
Program Fees
The only fees that may be charged to More at Four
families for services are nominal fees for
transporting children to/from the More at
Four program, or fees to cover the partial/full
costs of meals when families do not qualify
for free/reduced priced meals.
Wraparound Services and Fees
More
at Four dollars may not be used to pay
for wraparound services (time periods before
or after the regular school day). When wraparound
services are provided before and/or after the
regular school day, during holidays, or summer
months, the provider may charge a fee for that
service or accept a subsidy voucher from a
participating family. (See Division
of Child Development - Subsidy Questions and
Answers
Related to the More at Four Pre-Kindergarten
Programs;
Program Information/Supplemental Materials
to the Guidelines)
Transportation Plan and Fees
Plan. A written plan showing how the transportation
needs of potential children to be served shall
be developed by the contractor and/or sites.
Legislation allows for transportation of any
More at Four child to any More at Four site
on public school buses. If, after careful review,
it is determined that transportation cannot
be provided, the
contractor must maintain a written record of
what was considered.
Fees. Resources
may include the use of More at Four funds for
the More at Four portion
of the day. In particular instances and, as
approved by the More at Four Committee, families
may be charged a nominal fee to offset transportation
cost. Eligible children should not be denied
services based on the family’s inability
to pay for transportation services.
Guidelines § 4.D
Nutrition
Programs
must provide breakfast and/or snacks and lunch
meeting USDA requirements during
the regular school day. Fees may be charged
to cover the full/partial costs of meals when
children do not qualify for free/reduced price
lunch.
Source
of Funding for Preschool Program:
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 18C-164:
(a) … The
net revenues of the North Carolina State
Lottery Fund shall be transferred
four times a year to the Education Lottery
Fund, which shall be created in the State
treasury.
(b) From the Education Lottery Fund, the
Commission shall transfer a sum equal to
five percent (5%) of the net revenue of the
prior year to the Education Lottery Reserve
Fund.
…
(c) The Commission shall distribute the
remaining net revenue of the Education
Lottery Fund,
as follows, in the following manner:
(1) A sum equal to fifty percent (50%)
to support reduction of class size
in early grades to class size allotments
not exceeding
1:18 in order to eliminate achievement
gaps
and to support academic prekindergarten
programs for at-risk four-year-olds
who
would otherwise
not be served in a high-quality education
program in order to help those four-year-olds
be prepared developmentally to succeed
in school.
…
Scope
of Child's Right to Attend Preschool:
None.
Curriculum
Content Standards for Preschool Program:
N.C. Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24(a): The
[More
at Four] program shall include:
. . . (3) A curriculum or several
curricula that are research-based and/or built
on sound instructional theory. These curricula
shall: (i) focus primarily on oral language
and emergent literacy; (ii) engage children
through key experiences and provide background
knowledge requisite for formal learning and
successful reading in the early elementary
years; (iii) involve active learning; (iv)
promote measurable kindergarten language-readiness
skills that focus on emergent literacy and
mathematical skills; and (v) develop skills
that will prepare children emotionally and
socially for kindergarten.
Guidelines § 5.D. Instructional Components and Standards
Early Learning Standards
Local More at Four programs
are expected to provide developmentally appropriate,
high-quality pre-kindergarten experiences for
children. Such experiences are supported by Foundations:
Early Learning Standards for North Carolina
Preschoolers and
Strategies for Guiding
Their Success. These expectations define
the areas of child growth and development that
should be the focus of daily activities. ...
Instructional Assessment
Ongoing assessment for instructional purposes
is an integral part of high-quality programs
and is required for More at Four children.
Such assessments provide feedback about instruction
and evidence of child growth and skill development.
Both formal and informal assessments can achieve
this goal. The following instruments are recommended.
Recommended assessment instruments:
- High Scope Child Observation
Record (COR) (second edition)
- Work Sampling System (Meisels)
- Creative Curriculum Assessment Tool
- Galileo
On-line Assessment System
- Learning Accomplishment
Profile – Third
Edition (LAP-3)
Training in appropriate use of screening
and assessment instruments for instructional
planning
should be part of initial staff development
for all teaching staff that have not previously
completed appropriate training on these instruments.
Curricula for More
at Four Pre-K Programs
Curricula that have been reviewed and recommended to date include:
- Bright Beginnings pre-Kindergarten
Curriculum (Version 2, 2001)
- The Creative Curriculum
for Preschool (third edition, 2000; or fourth
edition, 2002)
- Educating Young Children:
Active Learning Practices for Preschool and
Child Care Programs
(High Scope) (second edition 2002)
- The Montessori Method
- Explorations with Young
Children: A
Curriculum Guide from the Bank Street College
(copyright 1992)
- Opening the World of Learning (copyright
2005)
Curricula and daily activities are the tools
used by instructional staff to provide opportunities
for children’s learning as described
in the widely held expectations of Foundations:
Early Learning Standards for North Carolina
Preschoolers and Strategies for Guiding Their
Success.
Training in appropriate use of curriculum
should be part of initial staff development
for all teaching staff that have not previously
completed appropriate training. Ongoing
staff development should also provide support
related to implementing the curriculum.
Teacher
Certification/Qualification Standards for
Preschool Program:
Guidelines § 6.B. Instructional Staff Standards
Instructional
staff is expected to work in direct contact with
children in the More at Four programs
for at least a 30-hour work week. In addition
to direct, day-to-day instructional activities,
instructional staff will need additional time
during the work week for other instructional
related activities, including time for planning,
scheduling and conducting home visits, meeting
with children's families, and/or attending required
professional development activities. These
related activities should take place outside
the 6 – 6 ½ hour day, and should
not exceed 40 hours per week. Local
programs will determine the length of the staff
day and year based on meeting staff’s ongoing
professional development needs. …
Guidelines § 6.C. Teacher Credentials
All
teachers will hold Birth-Kindergarten (B-K)
Standard Professional II or Preschool Add-on
licensure. When teachers
have less than the required credential, the
following requirements apply:
1. Provisional Approval
a. Public Schools
Teachers will hold at least a
(i) BA/BS degree
and Lateral Entry License and be working
toward B-K /Preschool Standard Professional
I.
or
(ii) Another NC or other state’s
license and a Provisional B-K license and be
working toward B-K Standard Professional I
or Preschool Add-on licensure.
b.
Nonpublic Schools (Private Child Care/Pre-Kindergarten
Settings)
(i)
Teachers will hold a minimum of an Early Childhood
Education/Child Development (ECE/CD)
associate degree and be working toward B-K
licensure.;
or
(ii)
Teachers will hold a BA/BS degree in early
childhood, child development, or a related
field, and a Lateral Entry License and be working
toward B-K licensure. Related fields include
human development and family studies and psychology.
or
(iii) Another NC or other state’s
license and a Provisional B-K license and be
working toward B-K Standard Professional I
or Preschool Add-on Licensure.
…
Teachers in More at Four classrooms shall
not serve as the administrator of the child
care center while assigned to a More at
Four classroom.
Guidelines § 6.D. Teacher Assistant
Credentials
All assistants will hold a CDA (Child Development
Associate) credential or an Early Childhood
Education/Child Development (ECE/CD) associate
degree. When
teacher assistants have less than a CDA
or an ECE/CD associate degree the following
requirements apply:
a. Provisional Approval – Nonpublic
Schools (Private Child Care/Pre-Kindergarten
Settings)
(i) Assistants will hold a high school diploma
or GED equivalent and be working toward the
CDA (minimum) or ECE/CD associate degree.
(ii) Progress toward the CDA or ECE/CD associate
degree will be considered a minimum of six
documented semester hours per year.
b. Exception
(i) Public
schools: Teacher assistants employed
by public schools are exempt from this requirement
to hold a CDA or ECE/CD associate degree if
they meet the following:
a. Meet employment requirements outlined by
the federal “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB)
legislation, and have one of the following:
i. Six documented hours of coursework in early
childhood education, or
ii. Two years of work experience in an early
childhood setting.
(ii) Non-public
schools: Teacher assistants
working in private settings with a BS/BA degree
in early childhood or child development or
a related
field (as defined by the local education agency)
would meet the education requirement.
Guidelines § 6.A.
Administrator Credentials
1. Public Schools
a. Principal licensure is required.
b. All principals/directors are encouraged
to hold a BS degree or complete coursework
in
ECE/CD.
2. Nonpublic Schools (Private Child Care/Pre-Kindergarten
Settings)
Directors/administrators
of nonpublic schools
must have a North Carolina Early Childhood
Administrative Credential (NCECAC) Level III. When the director/administrator has less than
the required NCECAC Level III, the following
will apply:
a. Provisional approval will be given for
four years for the director/administrator
with NCECAC
I or II to obtain the NCECAC Level III.
b. Progress toward NCECAC Level III will
be considered a minimum of six documented
semester
hours per year. The local More at Four contractor will maintain documentation
of the progress
towards the required standard.
c.
Administrators showing good faith effort towards
meeting the credential requirement
may be granted an extension to the four-year
timeline. Local programs must request
the extension in writing directed to the
More
at Four State
Program.
Guidelines § 6.H Professional
Development for More at Four Staff
Local Level. Local
professional development opportunities for
More at Four teachers, teacher assistants,
and administrators should, at a minimum,
include (to the extent feasible and that
funds are
available):
1. Orientation session
for new teachers, assistants, and administrators
that provides an overview of the focus and
purpose of the More at Four Pre-Kindergarten
Program, program requirements, and program
elements.
2. Ongoing professional development by qualified
presenters and based on the needs of the staff …
State-Level. The More at Four pre-K
State Program will offer professional development
opportunities for teachers, teacher assistants,
and administrators, to the extent feasible and
that funds are available.
Teachers with Lateral Entry, Provisional B-K,
or B-K Standard Professional I licensure are
subject to the North Carolina State Board of
Education (SBE) Teacher Licensure Policy and
procedures, which requires teachers to participate
in other orientation, training, and ongoing
professional development activities. ...
Other
Quality Standards for Preschool Program:
N.C. Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24(a): The
[More
at Four] program shall include:
. . . (4) An
emphasis on ongoing family involvement with the
pre-kindergarten program.
. . . (9) Standards for minimum teacher qualifications. A portion of the classroom sites initially funded shall have at least one teacher who is certified or provisionally certified in birth to kindergarten education.
Guidelines § 3.B. Children
with Disabilities.
More at Four programs are encouraged to be
inclusive. The value of inclusive settings
ensures that each child’s strengths,
unique learning needs, and abilities are addressed.
Because
public schools are required by federal law
to provide special education to eligible
4-year-olds, More at Four Pre-Kindergarten
Programs, regardless of the setting, and
public schools will collaborate in the
development and implementation of a child's
IEP (Individualized Education Program).
Guidelines § 5.E.
Staff-to-Child Ratio and Class Size.
A More
at Four Pre-Kindergarten Program
will not exceed a maximum staff to child
ratio
of 1 to 9 with a maximum class size of
18 children, with one teacher and one
assistant
teacher per classroom. Programs
that provide for inclusive settings for
children
with disabilities may require an adult
to child ratio smaller than 1 to 9 depending
on the nature and severity of the disabilities
of children served. Programs serving
children
that do not speak English, have limited
English proficiency, or a chronic health
condition
may also require an adult to child ratio
smaller than 1 to 9.
Guidelines § 4.D. Nutrition. Programs must provide breakfast and/or snacks and lunch meeting
USDA requirements during the regular school
day. Fees may be charged to cover the full/partial
costs of meals when children do not qualify
for free/reduced price lunch.
Guidelines § 4.F. Religious
Activities in Child Care Centers which accept More
at Four Funding. If a child care
center accepts funding from More at Four,
then to be consistent with various judicial
decisions, during the time the center is offering More
at Four programs, staff activities or communications
which promote religious beliefs or activities
cannot be directed towards More at Four participants. This
includes but is not limited to worship services,
teacher led prayer, or religious instruction. Furthermore,
various court rulings suggest that More
at Four participants
must be insulated from religious communications
or activities that may occur in other parts
of the center during that time. More
at Four participants shall not be prevented
from engaging in their personal religious
practices, provided those practices are not
initiated by center staff and do not disrupt
the instructional environment.
Guidelines § 5.F. Family
Involvement..
Family
involvement is critical to the success of
children during the pre-kindergarten year
and in subsequent years. Programs shall provide meaningful opportunities for parents and families that build trusting relationships and foster a bond between those involved in the education of the More at Four child . . .
Guidelines § 4.E. Transitions.
Written transition plans should be developed
by the More
at Four contractor
and/or sites and should:
- 1. Specify how children
will transition into the More at Four classroom.
- 2. Specify how children will transition
into kindergarten.
- 3. Reflect the diversity
and uniqueness of children, families and
communities.
- 4. Be revised as ongoing
transition efforts are expanded . . . .
Guidelines § 4.C.
Transportation Plan and Fees.
Plan. A
written plan showing how the transportation
needs
of potential children to be served shall
be developed by the contractor and/or
sites. Legislation allows for transportation
of any More at Four child to any More at
Four site on public school buses. If,
after careful review, it is determined
that transportation can not be provided,
the contractor must maintain a written
record of what was considered.
Fees. Resources
may include the use of More at Four funds
for the More
at Four portion of the day. In particular
instances and, as approved by the More at
Four Committee,
families may be charged a nominal fee
to offset transportation cost. Eligible
children should not be denied services based
on the family's inability to pay for transportation
services.
Guidelines § 4.A.
Facility Licensing Requirements.
Each participating More
at Four classroom must be located in a facility
that meets the requirements for a 4- or 5-star
licensed center using the Division of Child
Development licensing standards. More at
Four classrooms
may be placed in 4 or 5 star licensed public
and nonpublic schools. Nonpublic schools are
defined as private for-profit child care centers,
not-for-profit child care centers, and Head
Start programs operated by nonprofit organizations.
Public schools are defined as public pre-kindergarten
programs and Head Start programs operated by
public schools.
Guidelines § 7.A. ECERS-R Assessments.
... 2. The More at Four State
Program will be responsible for contracting
for the
classroom
assessments and selecting classrooms for the
assessments. To the extent possible, classrooms
will be assessed in their second year of operation
as a More at Four classroom.
…4. Classrooms
must score a minimum of 5.0 on the ECERS-R
during the first (second year of operation)
and any subsequent evaluations, effective
SFY 2007-2008.
Guidelines § 7.B.
Reported Child Abuse and Neglect Investigations.
The NC Division of Child
Development will notify the NC Office of School
Readiness anytime there is an open abuse and
neglect investigation occurring in a More
at Four site.
Delivery
of Preschool Services:
N.C. Session Laws 2007-323, § 7.24(a): The
[More
at Four] program shall include:
. . . (7) A system built upon existing
local school boards and systems, private child care providers, and other entities that demonstrate
the ability to establish or expand pre-kindergarten
capacity.
Guidelines § 2.A. Purpose of the More
at Four Committee.
The authorizing legislation for the More
at Four Pre-Kindergarten Program requires: “a
system built upon existing local school boards
and systems, private child care providers,
and other entities that demonstrate the ability
to establish or expand pre-kindergarten capacity.”
In complying with this legislative mandate,
the More at Four Pre-Kindergarten Program requires
every county (or region) that chooses to participate
in More at Four to establish and maintain a
County/Region More at Four Committee. The purpose
of the committee is to:
1. select a contractor agency;
2. develop operational policies and procedures;
3. ensure collaboration and shared responsibility
for developing, approving, and implementing
the local plan for delivering More at Four Pre-K services at the community level;
4. ensure that services are built on the existing
early childhood service delivery system and
that service providers in the community that
have the ability to provide More at Four Pre-K
services have the opportunity to express interest
and be considered;
5. provide ongoing, collaborative advice about
local policies and procedures in the implementation
of More at Four Pre-K services; and
6. provide oversight for the local program
(both program and fiscal).
Guidelines § 4.A. Facility Licensing Requirements.
Each participating More at Four Pre-Kindergarten Program must be located
in a facility that meets the requirements
for a 4- or 5-star licensed center using
the Division of Child Development licensing
standards. More at Four classrooms
may be placed in 4 or 5 star licensed public
and nonpublic schools. Nonpublic schools
are defined as private for-profit child care
centers, not-for-profit child care centers,
and Head Start programs operated by nonprofit
organizations. Public schools are defined
as public pre-kindergarten programs and Head
Start programs operated by public schools.
Exceptions
1. Licensed three-star child care centers
and Head Start programs (Nonpublic Schools):
Three star centers must work to attain
a rating of at least 4 stars to continue
participation
in the More at Four Pre-K Program. A
period of 3 years will be granted for programs
to move to a 4 or 5 star level.
2. Non-licensed
public school pre-kindergarten programs (Public
Schools): Public school pre-school programs
that are not licensed
under the Division of Child Development’s
star-rated licensing system may participate
in the More at Four Pre-K Program. However,
the Office of School Readiness/More at Four
State Program strongly recommends that such
programs come
into compliance with 4 or 5 star licensure.
Participating non-licensed public pre-kindergarten
programs are required to use developmentally
appropriate practices in managing and redirecting
children’s behavior, which does not include
the use of corporal punishment.
|